![]() ![]() Yes there are places to enter volumes like that. Last edited by kal on Thu 2:01 am edited 1 time in total Purchasing through our affiliate links helps support our site at no extra cost to you. We ship worldwide and support our products and customers for life. Our new shop with over 150 new products: If they're all zero then maybe it works out the same? (I don't know as I don't use Beersmith nor do I calculate my brewhouse efficiency - most people do not). Sounds like beersmith may not be using the term brewhouse efficiency correctly or more likely you haven't entered any loss numbers into beersmith? Brewhouse efficiency only makes sense when various losses are entered - see this diagram: Īre there places in BeerSmith to enter volume numbers like "amount lost in boil kettle" or "amount lost in fermenter"? When I say 95% efficiency I mean mash efficiency and mash efficiency isn't the same as brewhouse efficiency. When Kal's recipes say 95% Efficiency, does that correlate to Brewhouse efficiency in BeerSmith? Link Posted: Mon 11:02 pm Post subject: Re: Kal's Recipes with BeerSmith When Kal's recipes say 95% Efficiency, does that correlate to Brewhouse efficiency in BeerSmith? I did a quick test of the recipe for the Electric Pale Ale and the only way I could get my numbers to match what he posted (O.G., specifically) was to set my brewhouse efficiency to 95% with a 12G Batch Size.ĭoes this jive with anyone else's experience? Obviously I'll use my own brewhouse efficiency and scale the recipe accordingly, but just curious what others are doing with those numbers.ĭrinking: Pub Ale, Electric Creamsicle, Mild, Pliny the Younger, Belgian Dark Strong, Weizen, Russian Imperial Stout, Black Butte Porter
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |